Sunday, February 7, 2010

Nature Vs. Nuture, Divine Vs. Developed

Many seem to think that we, as humans, have more complex thought thought processes than other species. I feel that this discussion could be tied into the conversations we have been having in class on the debate over "nature vs. nurture." It could be argued that influences brought on by "nurture" are really "natural" because of their origins. It could be argued that the concept of civilization, and society, was developed along with our species as part of our nature. But how did all this come about? From an evolutionary perspective, there is little explanation for many of our customs, and our ability as humans to self-reflect. For example, why do we enjoy art and theatre? Why do we want to study Philosophy? Why are so inclined to follow religion? Why do we feel the need to reject many of our animal instincts? I think that religion explains a lot of this. The concept of "original sin" could represent our natural tendency to be uncivilized, and behave as we please, to our own benifit. The promise of a life after death leads us to be "good," and "thoughtful." Our ability do do so was bestowed upon us by a God-like force. But where did religion originate? This is a pospular question. Did the universe really start with the "big bang" or was the Earth and its people created by God? Did we develop our advanced ways of thinking through evolution or did God give them to us? We may never know for sure one way or another, so we may never know the origins of our "nurture" influence. I think that before we can further speculate "nature vs. nurture" it would be a good idea to examine the origins of nurture, and how, or if, they devellpped from nature.

Would you act any differently if you were absolutely sure there was no type of afterlife? Do you think others would? Why/ why not?

No comments:

Post a Comment